The Old Switcheroo

Monica Crowley of MSNBC's Connected says we should not condemn Karl Rove until all the facts are in. This reminds me of the situation that existed with regard to WMDs: we were not allowed to discuss them until all the evidence was in. Once all the evidence was in, and no WMDs were found, we still weren’t able to discuss it because they had changed the subject. They are using the same tactic now.

OK, if we wait until all the facts are in with regard to Karl Rove, and if it shows there was wrongdoing, is it all right to condemn him then?